I have a blog post. Which I hope that you use for collection. It is currently been blocked. I hope that it is just under maintenance. However, I do feel bad. As I did send out a lot of emails. However, I my legal and moral thought was this.
I have read the spam act clause. In which I did send out over 1,000 emails. So i could understand the warning of my cite, or even other areas falling under that act. However, as a special library I believe I fall under the Speech or Debate Clause of the First Amendment. As I am gaining no profit from my special library. Along with that, my speech is not commercial, as it is directed exactly at Legislation which falls under the speech and debate clause. However, as I feel that I should not send out email's anymore. I will shut down the activity of my own emailing. As I can't afford to set new precedent for special libraries that fall under the Fair Use Doctrine to be able to inform the public of major, major events like economic warfare attacks. As such, I would ask, if you can, since I have given over a year of my life to the study, if I can at least be given time to make the cite professional before I am closed out of it. As that is what I was working on today. Taking out all of the nonsensical getting through the study speech.
I will reprimand myself. Even though, I think I have great grounds in a very new and non debated area of internet law.
As I am a citizen congressional aid. In which my cite is wished to be used for specific legislation with regards to the Communist Chinese. I think it would be an interesting case. Of congress is a gathering of leader's and an aide is a helper. Then that is what I would argue. As the cite allows for their own individual leadership decision based on citizen collected information. Without possible CCP and MSS espionage agent infiltration into specific document production areas. As we have seen foreign agencies do before.
Therefore, if my special library studio is not shut down to my access. I would like to professionalize things, so I can leave it be. I need to move on anyways. In which I will no longer wield in under the new precedent I was going to try and create which was the ability of special libraries to use the Fair Use Doctrine, along with the Speech and debate clause to counter possible pin point infiltration into our government writing agencies, via citizen congressional aide.