This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation. "

Thus, we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN, 376 U. S. 254, 270 (1964). I fully believe to be as true as possible for a citizen working an espionage case to be as true to the good name of characters attacked on this cite as defined under acts of espionage. In which their actions supported a foreign country and place the US under ill will and determent as per their actions. These are my opinions based as reasonable to be stated as true in good faith towards reality of espionage activity. With very fair comments with regards to our biggest public interest. I have checked many cites and read many books. To create my opinions and areas of need for further research. I have created my reasoning based on algorithmic economic espionage coding, based on Dr. Nashe's theories of foreign actors using social algorithmic style codes to obtain desires to hurt the USA. My example, I fear is the best example. Is the two characters I have pin pointed for treason of espionage. Which is Dr. Locke and Dr. Van Jones. Both at which had and where able to take the US's newest and highest form of energy. Where instead of helping and creating strength in the US with production and growth. They leaked 80% of our green tech stimulus. Which can be defined under espionage activity, as per my unprofessional opinion of reading espionage cases, with regards to high treason and industrial espionage. Where there is no defense of political view point. As the US is now suffered great irreparable damage. As our green technological industries are not even in a normal US leadership role. Along with the loss of major surplus of manufacturing which leads to the skills needed to find defenses and ideas against to detect and deter green tech weaponization. Which is analogous to the nuclear and physics highest form of energy in the 50's.

Therefore, "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

I am not an anti communist. I am against a governments Economic Espionage Unit funding genocide an terrorism. Instead of trying to stop it. Also this is not an isolationist website. It is a competitive website. Currently the Communist own monopolies on full industries and the root supply chain which is resources. I am trying to get us to compete with them so we can build more market places. In which will slow or stop terrorism, as folks have jobs and something to do. Instead of one country is the world's police force spending all of its people's taxes on fear. While one is the worlds production monopoly.

I mean no ill will to Communist China. I do not wish to hurt their people. I aim to protect my people from an ancient evil of single tribal oppressive leadership. While helping the world compete better be spreading a major monopolized, militarized economy spread their power and wealth via Democracy and Free markets. I have had my life threatened and two attempts on my life already for my actions. Which you ain't seen nothing yet.

You read this cite and trust me baby you can do anything. Read this before a date and you a hero, read a passage before a test and you will pass. That is what they call Illuminati, picked for the ability to move mountains, and do anything.

If you have any concerns or statements about copy right infringement you think is not research. Please contact me at

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Monday, August 22, 2011

ISSUE Sanctions on Communist Chinese Imports under the Iran invest issue.

"A.  Broader Range of Sanctions
The Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 authorized the President to sanction foreign firms that make investments of more than $20 million per year in Iran's energy sector, or that sell weapons of mass destruction ("WMD") technology or "destabilizing numbers and types" of advanced conventional weapons to Iran.  CISADA changes the ISA to make clear that investment in energy pipelines is sanctionable activity.  Activities related to refined petroleum were also made sanctionable.  The proscribed activities include those involved with the production of refined petroleum products in Iran, or the exportation of refined petroleum products to Iran (or the facilitation thereof).  The provisions apply to firms that sell, lease, or provide goods, services, technology, information, or support that assists Iran's refining capacity, or that supply Iran with refined petroleum products.
CISADA also expanded the menu of available sanctions from six to nine, and increased the number of sanctions that the President is required to impose from two to three.  The original six sanctions, which remain in effect, are (1) denial of Export-Import Bank assistance; (2) denial of U.S. export authorizations; (3) denial of certain loans (over $10 million in 12 months) from U.S. financial institutions; (4) restrictions specific to sanctioned financial institutions; (5) a ban on U.S. Government procurement of goods and services from the sanctioned firm; and (6) import restrictions.  The three additions made by CISADA are (1) the prohibition on access to foreign exchange transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction; (2) the prohibition on transfers of credit or payments subject to U.S. jurisdiction; and (3) the prohibition on transactions with respect to property in which the sanctioned firm has an interest when subject to U.S. jurisdiction.  Under the original ISA, the President was required to choose two of the original six sanctions; CISADA now requires the President to choose three from the expanded nine-item list.  CISADA also adds new certifications for U.S. Government contracts.
CISADA requires sanctions for amounts exceeding $1 million in a single transaction, or $5 million in 12 months.  Additionally, CISADA made some formerly discretionary Presidential actions mandatory.  Previously, the ISA provided that the President "should initiate" an investigation upon receipt of credible information.  But CISADA amended the ISA to provide that the President "shall initiate" an investigation unless the President certifies to Congress that the firm is "no longer engaging in," or has "taken significant verifiable steps toward stopping the activity."  The President must also have "received reliable assurances" that the entity will not "knowingly engage" in sanctionable activity in the future (the "Special Rule"). CISADA also tightened the required certifications for Presidential waivers.  Waivers are now required to be "necessary" to the U.S. national interest, where they were previously required to be only "important."  Additionally, sanctions for entities under other governments with primary jurisdiction may be waived on a case-by-case basis for up to 12 months, where the President certifies that the government is closely cooperating with the United States regarding Iranian objectives and the waiver is "vital" to national security interests."

"Iran's recent invitation to Chinese oil companies and banks to invest $43 billion in Iran's oil industry"

:"In January, Iran and China signed a $1.76bn contract for the initial development of the North Azadegan oil field in western Iran."

No comments:

Post a Comment