This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation. "

Thus, we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN, 376 U. S. 254, 270 (1964). I fully believe to be as true as possible for a citizen working an espionage case to be as true to the good name of characters attacked on this cite as defined under acts of espionage. In which their actions supported a foreign country and place the US under ill will and determent as per their actions. These are my opinions based as reasonable to be stated as true in good faith towards reality of espionage activity. With very fair comments with regards to our biggest public interest. I have checked many cites and read many books. To create my opinions and areas of need for further research. I have created my reasoning based on algorithmic economic espionage coding, based on Dr. Nashe's theories of foreign actors using social algorithmic style codes to obtain desires to hurt the USA. My example, I fear is the best example. Is the two characters I have pin pointed for treason of espionage. Which is Dr. Locke and Dr. Van Jones. Both at which had and where able to take the US's newest and highest form of energy. Where instead of helping and creating strength in the US with production and growth. They leaked 80% of our green tech stimulus. Which can be defined under espionage activity, as per my unprofessional opinion of reading espionage cases, with regards to high treason and industrial espionage. Where there is no defense of political view point. As the US is now suffered great irreparable damage. As our green technological industries are not even in a normal US leadership role. Along with the loss of major surplus of manufacturing which leads to the skills needed to find defenses and ideas against to detect and deter green tech weaponization. Which is analogous to the nuclear and physics highest form of energy in the 50's.

Therefore, "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

I am not an anti communist. I am against a governments Economic Espionage Unit funding genocide an terrorism. Instead of trying to stop it. Also this is not an isolationist website. It is a competitive website. Currently the Communist own monopolies on full industries and the root supply chain which is resources. I am trying to get us to compete with them so we can build more market places. In which will slow or stop terrorism, as folks have jobs and something to do. Instead of one country is the world's police force spending all of its people's taxes on fear. While one is the worlds production monopoly.

I mean no ill will to Communist China. I do not wish to hurt their people. I aim to protect my people from an ancient evil of single tribal oppressive leadership. While helping the world compete better be spreading a major monopolized, militarized economy spread their power and wealth via Democracy and Free markets. I have had my life threatened and two attempts on my life already for my actions. Which you ain't seen nothing yet.

You read this cite and trust me baby you can do anything. Read this before a date and you a hero, read a passage before a test and you will pass. That is what they call Illuminati, picked for the ability to move mountains, and do anything.

If you have any concerns or statements about copy right infringement you think is not research. Please contact me at

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

CCP and MSS are Done Economic Democracy.

I have read papers which have the idea of economic nationalization; which is one thing, literally. However, the US does not have problems doing business with other countries free enterprises. However, the idea of economic Democracy is important. This idea is based on the material fact in which the power of the market place stays out of the hands of the political elite, except for regulation. They are the regulators and governors or like the referees. Which then allows for the proper balance of power and wealth spread.

This cite again is not about Nationalism. It is about the idea that if a foreign government wishes to procure or at least inter the US market place. They must be at a specific level of check and balance of their government by their people; this is called Democracy. As Democracy allows for the best check and balance. There are two parties or more that go at it in a Democracy. Which means there is no dark spots hidden as each party looks to outst the other, so they can lead. This then means the US gets the best leadership that they possible can.

Therefore, we then see these leaders creating laws and regulations not to own the economy as a party or state power. As they allow the people to own the wealth and vote to decide regulations. This then means it becomes a national security problem when the US allows in countries that do not have a Democracy in their economy at home. This is because we have seen over the years and in history. That specific countries that do not have a Democracy check and balance on their intelligence agencies; which specifically control the economy through a centralized agency like the SASAC; that they will do specific harm to cultures, freedom, and political power balance. As they wish to expand and to dominate via their unchecked intelligence activities of controlling the economy.

Furthermore, if we are to allow the Communist Chinese to come into the US market place, with their SOE's. It is not a matter of economic nationalism. It is a matter of economic Democracy. Already we can see that they are not holding true to their international treatise. Which the WTO made them sign so they could do business in the free market and Democracy world. This contracted stated that the Communist Chinese are not supposed to be subsidizing their SOE's at the hight of the level that they currently are. As this is unfair to the world. As we have seen the problem in the last world economic crash. As they where constantly subsidizing their economy and still are. Which then forced unfair centralization of the worlds economy. Thus leading to major imbalances via the unfair economic and trade activities.

This means that the Communist Chinese SOE's are more noncompetitive. In the long run they will destroy domestic market places if we allow them to. Which is exactly what we saw them do internationally as they heavily abused their ability to gain kindness for their transition. The Communist Chinese have already stated that they will never stop subsidizing their State Owned Enterprises. As such, we get back to the problem that we saw with the SS of the German Socialist Party and the KGB of the Soviet Empire. Which is they will use these entities to create major atrocities to the human peace and civility as they wish them to conquer. Instead of properly competing via non subsidized, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.

 We can see if we allow the Communist Chinese in. It will not be a matter of nationalistic economy. As the US does not believe in nationalistic economy in the first place. We believe in individual free markets. As  long as they are free markets and enterprises. Therefore, I would have to state that allowing in SINOMACH, Tylsa and NANSHANG would be illegal under international treatise, domestic economic security protocol, and the basic idea of the wish of the majority of American's to live in a Democracy, along with common law of the US economic system. Furthermore, it would allow the Communist Chinese to expand the very entities the US has gone to two world wars against, and one cold war. Which is a nationalistic economy where one party owns the economy and does things like fund genocide and terrorism to make sure their State Owned Enterprise nationalistic economy beats out the worlds.

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment