Lawyers should start being disbarred for not showing the proper objective view point to the Communist Chinese State Owned Enterprises. So far with Senator Reid's reports written by lawyers along with three Republican Mayors reports written in close similar fashion. I have not seen one of their reports properly written in objective manner to show the good and the bad. Then way the circumstances of their council at the end of the report. All I think I see in the reflection is literally them regurgitating reports written by the MSS then handed down through the algorithmic chain of cognitional attacks.
You can't take a fee and write a report on such a matter of federal issue, and have it be so inadequate in council. The privilege to advise such national and major issued leaders with such material is reserved for only the most objective writer. This blog cite was dedicated to stop these reports. As paid professionals do not have the privilege to act like unprofessional. Therefore, disbarment was meant for the purpose of professional misconduct. Everything from basic verbal harassment, all the way to sending unwanted letters, via the marketing act of the attorney profession is reason for disbarment to un-thorough reports of major issues.
As such, it could easily be seen as attorney neglect via misconduct due to a very important issue. In which reports are written missing very important pieces of information. Such as, WTO contracts with the Communist Chinese that says they are not supposed to be subsidizing their SOE's. So why would the US subsidize their SOE's. As the world wished for the Communist Chinese to turn into a free market not advance single party political power control of domestic and economic matters. Grounds should be neglect of duty to council properly.
What I am doing is unprofessional I can afford to be unprofessional. I do not get paid nobody relies upon my advice or research, and at this point in time I hold no professional license with regards to counciling. As such, when I plan to obtain such, this cite will be drudged down to a basic low level of insubordination to the CCP's and MSS's governance. Till then, I can clammer and do what I want under the first amendment, legal defense of Speech and Debate (civilian congressional aid) and fair use doctrine. However, the attorneys which have spoken not of the WTO agreements or anything with regards to the purpose of the Communist SOE's. Along with how they are not supposed to be being subsidized by their government, let alone ours. Is a major neglect of a professional's duty. Which substantiats in such a major deal as hundreds of millions of dollars going to an illegal subsidie as disbarment.