This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation. "

Thus, we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN, 376 U. S. 254, 270 (1964). I fully believe to be as true as possible for a citizen working an espionage case to be as true to the good name of characters attacked on this cite as defined under acts of espionage. In which their actions supported a foreign country and place the US under ill will and determent as per their actions. These are my opinions based as reasonable to be stated as true in good faith towards reality of espionage activity. With very fair comments with regards to our biggest public interest. I have checked many cites and read many books. To create my opinions and areas of need for further research. I have created my reasoning based on algorithmic economic espionage coding, based on Dr. Nashe's theories of foreign actors using social algorithmic style codes to obtain desires to hurt the USA. My example, I fear is the best example. Is the two characters I have pin pointed for treason of espionage. Which is Dr. Locke and Dr. Van Jones. Both at which had and where able to take the US's newest and highest form of energy. Where instead of helping and creating strength in the US with production and growth. They leaked 80% of our green tech stimulus. Which can be defined under espionage activity, as per my unprofessional opinion of reading espionage cases, with regards to high treason and industrial espionage. Where there is no defense of political view point. As the US is now suffered great irreparable damage. As our green technological industries are not even in a normal US leadership role. Along with the loss of major surplus of manufacturing which leads to the skills needed to find defenses and ideas against to detect and deter green tech weaponization. Which is analogous to the nuclear and physics highest form of energy in the 50's.

Therefore, "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

I am not an anti communist. I am against a governments Economic Espionage Unit funding genocide an terrorism. Instead of trying to stop it. Also this is not an isolationist website. It is a competitive website. Currently the Communist own monopolies on full industries and the root supply chain which is resources. I am trying to get us to compete with them so we can build more market places. In which will slow or stop terrorism, as folks have jobs and something to do. Instead of one country is the world's police force spending all of its people's taxes on fear. While one is the worlds production monopoly.

I mean no ill will to Communist China. I do not wish to hurt their people. I aim to protect my people from an ancient evil of single tribal oppressive leadership. While helping the world compete better be spreading a major monopolized, militarized economy spread their power and wealth via Democracy and Free markets. I have had my life threatened and two attempts on my life already for my actions. Which you ain't seen nothing yet.

You read this cite and trust me baby you can do anything. Read this before a date and you a hero, read a passage before a test and you will pass. That is what they call Illuminati, picked for the ability to move mountains, and do anything.

If you have any concerns or statements about copy right infringement you think is not research. Please contact me at

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Monday, July 11, 2011

ISSUE The USA does not have an economic threat meter. .

What is our economic warfare defense level's and tools?

The idea that the US does not have an economic threat meter to me is like one stating it did not have a militia attack threat meter. This then does not allow the proper focus on specific areas of the world that cause the US the most economic threat. The militia threat meter lets the US know what countries are at most threat for attack by individual foreign militia members. This is erroneously called the terrorist threat level.

As such, seeing that the US is going through a new form of warfare. Which is economic warfare, going all the way from non market actors, espionage to cyber warfare. I would say the US needs to have a new level of threat engagement for each country. As this then would allow US leaders and business folks to gauge each countries propensity to attack them economically. This would allow all security measures from the TSA to the very basic clerk in the legislation office. To have a basic scope for each country when doing business with its citizens and personnel. Therefore, giving a better spread of protection against what we have been seeing with the US. Which is a whole sale slaughter of its business and treasury by foreign countries that folks do not even know are a threat. Like Nigera for example. If the US had an economic threat level for Nigera. Then they could do proper searches of their material in a deeper level for suitcases filled with money. Or for international post masters. They could do a proper address of where specific items where being sent to in Nigera. As Nigera is the worlds per capital phish scamming country of the world. They make more money on scamming people than they do anything else.

A professional report flushing this out. Exactly like we flushed our our foreign militia member threat would be good.

A way to gauge something usually allows for a proper centralization of defense to the matter. For example, prior to our ability to track and trace primitative militia members in foreign lands. Our ability to gauge where they where from was so vague we just called them terrorist. However, now we know that if they sleep in a land that gives them protection like Pakistan. Then they are considered Pakistani militia members. Along with that if a bigger country uses a smaller country and forces them to house them via economic warfare, like cheap loan's or close to nothing jet fighter plane's. Then we can then say that those militia members are being puppeted by that bigger country purely via protection and armorment.

To me calling somebody a terrorist is like writing a paper. However, only leaving the brief and none of the specific details. It is weak and inappropriate in a real world to call a persona  terrorist. Their is hardly such a thing. As all countries either aid or abide their militia members. Like our Winchester long rifle cowboys. We can hit a nickel up to three quarters of a mile away. Take out almost 10 troops on quick snipe before pinned by satellite and then disappear. That is not US terrorist that is our militia members. Always brass first to create confusion. We have even create bullet manufacturing that can get through futuristic CCP and MSS electromagnetic camp shields. Which is very relevant in today's guerrilla warfare. As when the CCP and MSS invade as they will like any major country building up. We have to be ready for their Subturnal scientist inventions.

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment