This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation. "

Thus, we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN, 376 U. S. 254, 270 (1964). I fully believe to be as true as possible for a citizen working an espionage case to be as true to the good name of characters attacked on this cite as defined under acts of espionage. In which their actions supported a foreign country and place the US under ill will and determent as per their actions. These are my opinions based as reasonable to be stated as true in good faith towards reality of espionage activity. With very fair comments with regards to our biggest public interest. I have checked many cites and read many books. To create my opinions and areas of need for further research. I have created my reasoning based on algorithmic economic espionage coding, based on Dr. Nashe's theories of foreign actors using social algorithmic style codes to obtain desires to hurt the USA. My example, I fear is the best example. Is the two characters I have pin pointed for treason of espionage. Which is Dr. Locke and Dr. Van Jones. Both at which had and where able to take the US's newest and highest form of energy. Where instead of helping and creating strength in the US with production and growth. They leaked 80% of our green tech stimulus. Which can be defined under espionage activity, as per my unprofessional opinion of reading espionage cases, with regards to high treason and industrial espionage. Where there is no defense of political view point. As the US is now suffered great irreparable damage. As our green technological industries are not even in a normal US leadership role. Along with the loss of major surplus of manufacturing which leads to the skills needed to find defenses and ideas against to detect and deter green tech weaponization. Which is analogous to the nuclear and physics highest form of energy in the 50's.

Therefore, "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

I am not an anti communist. I am against a governments Economic Espionage Unit funding genocide an terrorism. Instead of trying to stop it. Also this is not an isolationist website. It is a competitive website. Currently the Communist own monopolies on full industries and the root supply chain which is resources. I am trying to get us to compete with them so we can build more market places. In which will slow or stop terrorism, as folks have jobs and something to do. Instead of one country is the world's police force spending all of its people's taxes on fear. While one is the worlds production monopoly.

I mean no ill will to Communist China. I do not wish to hurt their people. I aim to protect my people from an ancient evil of single tribal oppressive leadership. While helping the world compete better be spreading a major monopolized, militarized economy spread their power and wealth via Democracy and Free markets. I have had my life threatened and two attempts on my life already for my actions. Which you ain't seen nothing yet.

You read this cite and trust me baby you can do anything. Read this before a date and you a hero, read a passage before a test and you will pass. That is what they call Illuminati, picked for the ability to move mountains, and do anything.

If you have any concerns or statements about copy right infringement you think is not research. Please contact me at

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Admiral's Mullen Speech with regards to the strategy in the Middle East

First of all from the Dody of DOD, I thought the speech was well placed well covered in brief and brought great ideas for the people of the USA to further their thoughts and wishes to help the Middle east. I love the analysis of how Iran's non Democracy creates major issues of social impacts that affect the people.

I fully stand with Senator Joe Manchin on the matter of Communist China.

Dr. Panetta you have very horrible eye contact. You look like you are trying to hide something. I agree with you on the issues of both economic and national security. Show me your soul when you speak to us. You can look up you are not reading anything, you can think and show us your soul.

Senator Joe Manchin it is not a war on terror. It is a war on proxy agents and you are correct that we are not benefiting economically except for gaining intelligence to stop domestic radical proxies.

You showed your soul very well Admiral Mullen you seem to be strong in your belief's. You did have a Freudian slip. With comrades.

Senator of the faith, I believe Graham. The reality is we can run wars at a lot cheaper if we use proxies instead of our trillion dollar defense military. In which we are seeing now in Libya. Where the cost for that was is a lot less. Along with our ability to gain the full strength of the people. As instead of the US going in it is the people going in. So they are working together. There is less radicalism and more togetherness with the people. Where you stated we need to be there. I do not think we do. I think we need to do proxy wars like we did during the cold war. I think we could cut troops and trainers and just specific pin point proxy creation to fight wars. Instead of full scale trillion dollar military.

Now my arse chewing.

I think that his analysis in the middle east about Iran and parts of the mission determine how much force we need is really good.

I would have liked to hear more about how we can better secure our soldier's by placing more tech and less human life in the area.

I believe we have done really well in the area of using our technology to our advantage. Things like removing IED's to a lower threat using tech to find them, and tech to stop them from hurting our people.

However, we can say that the area we need the most to realize is our major areas of gaps in our ability to defend against their primitive tech.

The speech strategy in the middle east should be addressed on the cost and analysis of two points. Which are basically the ability of the enemy which is the radical force of those unwanting to be part of a peaceful society.

Therefore, I think we should specific congressional meetings with the DOD about our technology. As the major ability of the US to use technology in the war is a big deal

Examples of major failures:
1. The strategy to keep entrance vehicles in the ground and have no specific hang out vehicles. As we where before a blot warfare gamer and then became a whipe gamer. This was a major failure in technological strategy. Which lost us a lot of lives and billions in lost economy.

2. The ability of the US social tech's to use proper permitting and work with the congress of the middle eastern people to properly place pressure on anyone who has ties to vehicle's or other radical acts, by placing business restrictions on them for not reporting radical activities, and having a nexues to the activities. Which unlike just arresting them and making things worse. The business nexuses means they can't feed their children and lose their business. Which means they have to go work for somebody who will report them.

3. The ability to have hands on fast movement of technology to battle field is also horrible. When we created infer red. It started at a very big item. Which we then at a very old stage of transitional microziation took some time to get it down to eye's and scopes. This then we see that the ex ray tech which should have gone from disk size down to cell or even micro size. Still has not happened. If it would have happened we would see our forces abilities and lost lives shrink just like infer red did for the US. This is because if we can place that tech on scopes or even gogles or full scale humvee's before check points. We could easily diagnose how vehicles. However, we have not done that.

4. The US's proxy tech. In which the US used to be the world's best proxy agent creation in the world. We have seen the US turn into the Soviet Union of the world. Where we use full scale trillion dollar militarizes. Instead of using proxy wars like we did during the cold war, we are currently forcing ourselves into a Charlie Wilson style liquidation war. In which we are going through the same thing that the Soviet's did trying to be the world's savior. We can't save ourselves. We need to create and retool our old proxy war tech. In which we where able to develop more economies with economic warfare and less physical militarise.

5. The ability of the US to quickly and swiftly get tech on buildings when terrorist take them out. A group of terrorist's took over a building an prepared to launch RPG'sRPG canon's that move much faster when projected than an RPG to stop them from reaching the Embassy. Hand held anti RPG devices are not properly placed in Embassies for use or even strategic defense.

6. The ability of the US to create secure aqueducts for the area of farmers. Where folks that are well fed are usually happy. Aqueduct tech was bad.

7. Our funding issues. The US had no oversight of specific funding or projects. Where accountans and economists are the most important part of a war. This war on the proxy agents of the Sheik, Iran and Communist China. We had none. Where we lost billions of dollars as our economic warfare department was horrible with their dep coms in the field. Economic accounting in military funding is the most important. Where we funded our own enemies because we had no skilled economic warfare analysis there.

The US military strategy on tech of social, physical and economic was very bad. The ability of the US to turn on a dime on issues was horrible also. The Dep Coms of the Economic Warfare department are the root of the matter. As economic warfare analysis could not properly get things done in a manner that allowed them to have General's of Economic Warfare. As there is no position for that. Which is another problem the US has. In the cold war 20 years ago. The US has many General's of Economic Warfare along with the whole pyramid specific addressing economic warfare against the Soviet Expansion using militriazed economy and proxy wars. Today we see that the main problems rest around the US military to get department of communications opened so economic warfare agents can actually get things done with the strength of a General and a battalion. Which we do not have.

Rider I
That is your arse chewing general from the I. From What I can think on brief. 

No comments:

Post a Comment