This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation. "

Thus, we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN, 376 U. S. 254, 270 (1964). I fully believe to be as true as possible for a citizen working an espionage case to be as true to the good name of characters attacked on this cite as defined under acts of espionage. In which their actions supported a foreign country and place the US under ill will and determent as per their actions. These are my opinions based as reasonable to be stated as true in good faith towards reality of espionage activity. With very fair comments with regards to our biggest public interest. I have checked many cites and read many books. To create my opinions and areas of need for further research. I have created my reasoning based on algorithmic economic espionage coding, based on Dr. Nashe's theories of foreign actors using social algorithmic style codes to obtain desires to hurt the USA. My example, I fear is the best example. Is the two characters I have pin pointed for treason of espionage. Which is Dr. Locke and Dr. Van Jones. Both at which had and where able to take the US's newest and highest form of energy. Where instead of helping and creating strength in the US with production and growth. They leaked 80% of our green tech stimulus. Which can be defined under espionage activity, as per my unprofessional opinion of reading espionage cases, with regards to high treason and industrial espionage. Where there is no defense of political view point. As the US is now suffered great irreparable damage. As our green technological industries are not even in a normal US leadership role. Along with the loss of major surplus of manufacturing which leads to the skills needed to find defenses and ideas against to detect and deter green tech weaponization. Which is analogous to the nuclear and physics highest form of energy in the 50's.

Therefore, "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

I am not an anti communist. I am against a governments Economic Espionage Unit funding genocide an terrorism. Instead of trying to stop it. Also this is not an isolationist website. It is a competitive website. Currently the Communist own monopolies on full industries and the root supply chain which is resources. I am trying to get us to compete with them so we can build more market places. In which will slow or stop terrorism, as folks have jobs and something to do. Instead of one country is the world's police force spending all of its people's taxes on fear. While one is the worlds production monopoly.

I mean no ill will to Communist China. I do not wish to hurt their people. I aim to protect my people from an ancient evil of single tribal oppressive leadership. While helping the world compete better be spreading a major monopolized, militarized economy spread their power and wealth via Democracy and Free markets. I have had my life threatened and two attempts on my life already for my actions. Which you ain't seen nothing yet.

You read this cite and trust me baby you can do anything. Read this before a date and you a hero, read a passage before a test and you will pass. That is what they call Illuminati, picked for the ability to move mountains, and do anything.

If you have any concerns or statements about copy right infringement you think is not research. Please contact me at

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Class warfare

I do not understand how somebody making millions of dollars. With a bank account and savings more than most folks make in their live's asking them to pay the same tax rate as other's will affect jobs. These people are not creating jobs because nobody is motivating them. So if they lose some of their funds, guess what they will want to make it back. So they will work harder.

It does not make sense to me. If a person making $30,000 has to pay a certain tax. Why would not somebody making $250,000 pay the same tax.

I guess the argument would be and the only one I can see. Is that they both get the same amount of government services. So each should pay the exact same amount of funds. For example if the $30,000 pays $8,000 then the $250,000 should pay $8,000. I do not think that is proper.

Then it would have to be refuted. At which point we would then have to destroy the idea of governance. The idea of governments is the bigger taking care of the smaller and still being on equal grounds. So that would be the only root argument I could see makes sense.

As the rich currently have bigger bank account's have more savings and do more with there's than the poor. They really do not use that extra money to create jobs. Especially when they invest it and gain more money from it.

Then I just keep circling around the idea that if we all paid the same amount then what?  To me it is the percent tax or flat rate argument. Which I am sure has been argued. I am for the percent as I believe in governance I am not an anarchist. I love the secure feeling I get knowing we are all in this together.

I guess the legislative intent of percents over flat fee's should be dug up for better cognitional ammo.

Historical legislation I believe in economcis we have always used percents as a fair level of calculation. Why is not coming to me. besides the obvious we need the funds and it creates a more balances country of togetherness.

I have a good one to refute the idea that the rich created jobs during the tax break. Um we lost more jobs in the last decade than any other time in this country. So the rich are still going to outsource and they did not create enough jobs or use the money to keep jobs here.

Class warfare means the rich versus the poor. As via Marxist doctrine explains. This is not the rich versus the poor. This is the government as a whole rich and poor trying to balance itself. In a reality class warfare would be the rich having to give money to the poor directly. However, in this action of tax breaks that did not work worth nothing, being stopped, is just status quo being placed back.

Now incert historical legislation on why we use percents over flat fee and we can see that if it is class warfare. it is the rich seeking to take more from the poor, via lowest wages every, most atrocities by the rich via investments and lost jobs and a slew of other things that would show this countries rich just got this countries most historical bailout, then they want to not pay for it.

In Marxism there are two classes. The rich and poor. In this then the idea becomes that in class war the poor are to take all from the rich at any means that they can. So if we look at what has gone on. We see that this is not happening. The poor actually pitched in to keep the rich markets like stock markets and other markets like insurance and things very low by bailing them out. As the rich have to have insurance to pay for their things they make mistakes on. Which without the bailouts the poor GAVE to the rich. Insurance would be sky high right now for all business and all rich.

So then we see not only are the poor not taken from the Rich like Class Warfare is historical defined as. But the it is the rich being stingy after the poor bailed out their insurance rates. In which the poor now need them to help out and balance both sides government. As the rich just like the poor use governance. However, they use it more as more often than not it is the rich that benefit from war, mistakes in rich markets like the stocks and bonds, and also real estate booms.

Do I think we should all pay the same tax yes. Flat fee maybe not, as then the government would not be healthy. Percentage yes I do think so. As it is proven that allowing the rich to have a less tax bracket does not really do anything except create more mischief by their ability to control the markets. I guess the thing would be the rich are allowed to control the mass wealth of the US. So to blame the poor and not want to pay proper penance would mean that the rich are the ones controlling our wealth with 1% controlling 90% of our wealth in this country. So if this economy is in trouble it is that top parts of the pyramid. As they had tax breaks, and they had stimulus and they had bailouts. This goes the other way. If the Champion's have failed the economy. Then it should not be the poor who feel the blow alone. The Champions should also feel it too. Again or the populace feel untamed and harmed by their Champions.

Our Champions currently have not been wiped by the populace for a long time. In which they are not championing our causes. We see the rich using the enslavement of the Communist more and more. Which means they gain more while their poor all of us lose more. Which means that is not taming their people.

So in other words the way it works is in a society with mutiplict classes. If the Champions take from the poor, by gaining more from enslavement of another countries people. They then have to replace that has been taken from the poor. Which means a balanced percentage of tax. It is not our fault. We do not fund the political leader's, we not deal with the big contracts and mass layoffs to enslave the Chinese people. We do not do these things. We just swim in the river. You control it and at times we mark the twain of it and thus complain when you start to dry us up.

It is historical. If a king when's then if he does not share with his people the winnings. They will be mad. If a King loses if the does not appease the people of their lost one's or lost valuables from the loss, he will lose.

Currently our rich are losing against two very powerful Intelligence agencies. A disapated still existent from my research and rhetoric tag to watch their pipelines of intelligence, the KGB, and the MSS. Both of which have set themselves up as major runners of their SOE's. Which they then have made themselves very powerful and use any means necessary to destroy our economy via class warfare. Which is the ultra powerful the MSS and KGB. Who have more might in one hand than any of our free enterprises. Against our free enterprises.

So then if the idea of raising taxes to balance our government is class warfare. Then the idea of the MSS dropping taxes is also class warfare. As they are doing it to gain our countries rich's technology, forced hostile take overs through joint ventures and party secretaries and espionage agents and a whole slew of other things. That our rich are allowing to happen to them. Which in turn then allows to happen to their people who have to swim in the economy that they control and regulate via their holdings. So then who will fight the ultra powerfull for our rich.

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment