This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation. "

Thus, we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN, 376 U. S. 254, 270 (1964). I fully believe to be as true as possible for a citizen working an espionage case to be as true to the good name of characters attacked on this cite as defined under acts of espionage. In which their actions supported a foreign country and place the US under ill will and determent as per their actions. These are my opinions based as reasonable to be stated as true in good faith towards reality of espionage activity. With very fair comments with regards to our biggest public interest. I have checked many cites and read many books. To create my opinions and areas of need for further research. I have created my reasoning based on algorithmic economic espionage coding, based on Dr. Nashe's theories of foreign actors using social algorithmic style codes to obtain desires to hurt the USA. My example, I fear is the best example. Is the two characters I have pin pointed for treason of espionage. Which is Dr. Locke and Dr. Van Jones. Both at which had and where able to take the US's newest and highest form of energy. Where instead of helping and creating strength in the US with production and growth. They leaked 80% of our green tech stimulus. Which can be defined under espionage activity, as per my unprofessional opinion of reading espionage cases, with regards to high treason and industrial espionage. Where there is no defense of political view point. As the US is now suffered great irreparable damage. As our green technological industries are not even in a normal US leadership role. Along with the loss of major surplus of manufacturing which leads to the skills needed to find defenses and ideas against to detect and deter green tech weaponization. Which is analogous to the nuclear and physics highest form of energy in the 50's.

Therefore, "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

I am not an anti communist. I am against a governments Economic Espionage Unit funding genocide an terrorism. Instead of trying to stop it. Also this is not an isolationist website. It is a competitive website. Currently the Communist own monopolies on full industries and the root supply chain which is resources. I am trying to get us to compete with them so we can build more market places. In which will slow or stop terrorism, as folks have jobs and something to do. Instead of one country is the world's police force spending all of its people's taxes on fear. While one is the worlds production monopoly.

I mean no ill will to Communist China. I do not wish to hurt their people. I aim to protect my people from an ancient evil of single tribal oppressive leadership. While helping the world compete better be spreading a major monopolized, militarized economy spread their power and wealth via Democracy and Free markets. I have had my life threatened and two attempts on my life already for my actions. Which you ain't seen nothing yet.

You read this cite and trust me baby you can do anything. Read this before a date and you a hero, read a passage before a test and you will pass. That is what they call Illuminati, picked for the ability to move mountains, and do anything.

If you have any concerns or statements about copy right infringement you think is not research. Please contact me at

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Economic national security matter with regards to our last stimulus, us economic floor and the major leak up to 80% of our last stimulus package that left us in the same predicament.

Chief I was with the first stimulus and kind of like think my four hundred letters with regards to the New Green Deal helped it become so to stop the Communist Chinese Economic Espionage unit the MSS whole sale buying of the US market place. However, I am not with your new stimulus. As it will not solve for the basic problem. And the whole economy will just sink through the bottom again like the last stimulus did. Which means we will end up in more inflation and in another four years back to a high unemployment. Here are my suggestions.
That is not the way to do it. We need rare earth resources If we where to open up 3 miner permits in each state with about a quarter mile each. Which would produce around just 700 tons each. That would be enough to bring back jobs create jobs and to spread out 66 million for each mine across the US. Which would then gain the US around an 8 to 14 trillion dollar US surplus. Thus destroying the deficit and creating jobs via the root of the supply chain which is resources. It would be like what we did during the Gold Rush when we needed jobs and had to spread out folks. I think more stimulus is wrong and will not solve the key root issue that the Fort Sumter mineral rush solved for.

Then again you would have to understand major economic warfare strategies and why Fort Sumter and Alaska where so propagated for mineral rushes.

Thoughts that came up after I sent letter. What is the floor and how did the Stimulus go through it? My predictions unprofessionally. Would state that the floor would be the supply side with the root of supply side economics being at the resource equation. I think I am right as the New Green Deal went right out the floor because of our lack of spread out competitive rare earth mines in the US. Where we lost 80% of the New Green Deal Stimulus at over 1.9 billion. Along with major other parts of other stimulus's.

The last stimulus which was very heft still kept us at the same unemployment level. It dropped a little bit with the stimulus but then just rose again as our floor was not there to keep our companies here in the US.

Rider I


Resource rush lobby expanded on.

For example the reason why Obamas new stimulus plan will fail like the last one. In the days of the last stimulus we saw such economic atrocities as whole bridge parts being built in Communist Chinas SOEs. Which are used to launder money for Hamas and Al Queada along with sell weapons to people like Gadafi and Iran who then use them to terrorize human beings. Along with that because we had and currently have not enough resources to floor the stimulus package we will see uneducated economists in each state that receives the stimulus package being heavily lobbied by the MSS economic espionage units to again force the US to lose around eighty percent of its stimulus like we did last time. That is a major problem. We need a analogous mineral rush like we did during Fort Sumter and Klondike. As that is our problem our economists in this country do not know how to lay down a foundation to hold in the US stimulus money. So we lost millions of jobs and billions of dollars to foreign countries that our citizens and children s tax payers have to pay for. Which cost the US its unemployment level as the last stimulus even though I was with us did not do anything to the unemployment level do to the high MSS economic espionage lobbying to drain the US of its stimulus package which it did a great job.
Therefore three mine permits per state would re lay a foundation in this country. Small mines like we did before when we where in a deficit and seriously losing military bases and intelligence bases. This will help all US government funds stay in the US. As Communist Chinese stimulus funds do not go to American business or jobs to export to them. This is war not some panzy idea of a one world China policy where it is ok for them to fund and launder money for those that kill us and Democracy people everyday that we spend trillions of dollars each year fighting against.

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment