This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation. "

Thus, we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN, 376 U. S. 254, 270 (1964). I fully believe to be as true as possible for a citizen working an espionage case to be as true to the good name of characters attacked on this cite as defined under acts of espionage. In which their actions supported a foreign country and place the US under ill will and determent as per their actions. These are my opinions based as reasonable to be stated as true in good faith towards reality of espionage activity. With very fair comments with regards to our biggest public interest. I have checked many cites and read many books. To create my opinions and areas of need for further research. I have created my reasoning based on algorithmic economic espionage coding, based on Dr. Nashe's theories of foreign actors using social algorithmic style codes to obtain desires to hurt the USA. My example, I fear is the best example. Is the two characters I have pin pointed for treason of espionage. Which is Dr. Locke and Dr. Van Jones. Both at which had and where able to take the US's newest and highest form of energy. Where instead of helping and creating strength in the US with production and growth. They leaked 80% of our green tech stimulus. Which can be defined under espionage activity, as per my unprofessional opinion of reading espionage cases, with regards to high treason and industrial espionage. Where there is no defense of political view point. As the US is now suffered great irreparable damage. As our green technological industries are not even in a normal US leadership role. Along with the loss of major surplus of manufacturing which leads to the skills needed to find defenses and ideas against to detect and deter green tech weaponization. Which is analogous to the nuclear and physics highest form of energy in the 50's.

Therefore, "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

I am not an anti communist. I am against a governments Economic Espionage Unit funding genocide an terrorism. Instead of trying to stop it. Also this is not an isolationist website. It is a competitive website. Currently the Communist own monopolies on full industries and the root supply chain which is resources. I am trying to get us to compete with them so we can build more market places. In which will slow or stop terrorism, as folks have jobs and something to do. Instead of one country is the world's police force spending all of its people's taxes on fear. While one is the worlds production monopoly.

I mean no ill will to Communist China. I do not wish to hurt their people. I aim to protect my people from an ancient evil of single tribal oppressive leadership. While helping the world compete better be spreading a major monopolized, militarized economy spread their power and wealth via Democracy and Free markets. I have had my life threatened and two attempts on my life already for my actions. Which you ain't seen nothing yet.

You read this cite and trust me baby you can do anything. Read this before a date and you a hero, read a passage before a test and you will pass. That is what they call Illuminati, picked for the ability to move mountains, and do anything.

If you have any concerns or statements about copy right infringement you think is not research. Please contact me at

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

How to secure our schools.

So if there is 120,000 schools. And each one will need about one windmill to pay for its overhead and labor for the year. Then if we where to spend around 82 billion we could literally take the public school system off the liabilities and assets sheet, and also probable make an asset to the sheet, as it creates an extra boost in energy and takes strain of our very strained grid. The Windmills however, need to to still have their rotors and rotor cuffs worked on as they still make to much money when the weigh to the arm moves around the rotors.

The better idea would be to actually set up wind farms for the schools. In a place of high wind near the schools. So they could operate and pay for the schools and labor, but be out of the ears of the children as they learn. I mean my thoughts is the public pays for schools. Yet, we get out children being watched and them focusing during the day. However, if we could pay for something then get something out of it like cheap energy and then actually lower our costs on the overhead sheet that would be great. I mean then we would not be paying for energy and schools. We would just be paying for schools. While the energy market as it is a very big one would still have the majority of the market place.

That is what I would do. As I do not think sinking 82 billion into a school system that can barely keep its overhead going without a deficit is going to solve the root problem. Along with that if you solve the root problem, then you also solve the other problems of necessary upgrades as the left over overhead from the costs could be used to upgrade as they go. Which would mean the ~million a year it costs for a school instead of labor and overhead could be used for upgrades to every school.

So if the school gets about at max $500,000 per each windmill if placed at max velocity. Then we could actually expect each at a very lost expectation school to receive about maybe $250,000 from each windmill. Which would mean that it would pay for itself over about 15 years at about $3.4 million per install and cost. Then about $30,000 a year to maintain. At .11 cents per kilowatt. Which it would probable be a lot cheaper as the whole sale cost for around 120,000 of them is around 82 billion which is about 218 billion cheaper. So it might be due able if that is true.

Then the school should take some money and put it in a savings account for upgrades to the windmill to be able to get more not for profit capital out of it to pay for salaries and upgrades. I mean each school saving around $200,000 puts about 4 teachers back to work, or around 2 teachers and a full scale upgrade then 2 more teachers. That would put about 400,000 root people back to work not including the multiplier affect of that issue. Which could come out to about 600,000 at end equation.

Which means at about 4.7 million killowatts times about 120,000 windmills. Means about 4.7 times about .12
equates to 564 million killowatts which is not even one full city in the US. So the Energy market place can't really complain. As it takes 3.5 billion killowatts just to fund one single city of 140,000 people.

Rider I
Don Cohote

No comments:

Post a Comment