For example, let's take a mine in Communist China. Currently they dump massive amounts of waste into rivers and get away with it. While killing their own red neck's rivers to fish, swim and enjoy the cold water and hope they do not get bit style enjoyments of life. Therefore, we then look at the USA. Would our green party here in the states every allow that to happen. No, I mean look at Exon when they spilled in my favorite River to go hiking and swimming in the Merced. . It was on the news that day and it was properly covered and properly placed pressure on it.
The reason why the US's needs to start domestic mining is not only to create a smaller carbon foot print but to also create jobs so we can produce more and compete in the green tech industry. As currently our green tech industries due to lack of cheap minerals for production has almost closed our green tech industries and is allowing them to wither because of our inability to compete with the Communist Chinese almost monopoly on resources. Which means we are actually losing the ability to advance green technology. As the Communist Chinese are the basic competitors in the world. Which means the US's ingenuity to build then learn while building as skills advance is almost but being lost.
As such, along with that if we where to open up 3 small family mines per state, creating around 66 million per year. Which would be more likely to listen to pressure of regulations. We would see the end of the Deficit, and a drop in unemployment. As we saw in North Dakota when they did the experiment in a microcosm. This then means, we could see our production lines come back. As the root to the algorithmic equation for the supply chain is currently missing in the US. Which is the resource floor spread out across the US for production plants. Which then allows the chain to connect to the production, then sales of exports. Along with this instead of seeing one major mining company producing all of the minerals and still having to compete with supply chain prices. We could open up mines closer to states. So their supply chain would be much easier to get to, and much cheaper than the Communist Chinese currently monopoly on resources.
This then would not destroy jobs in the world market but create more of them as we also took down the worlds carbon foot print. This is because historically and practically along with logically competition breads more market places. As we have seen in the world. When a country allows for a competitive market place their market place grows. This is because they have to search out new market places of value to keep trading. This means that if we take that small microcosm and we take to a macro level of country to country competition we can see the same affect. Therefore, instead of currently the Communist Chinese creating market places with their massive monopoly on resources and strangle hold on the world's supply chains. We could see the US start to compete with them and other countries alike. Which would force all of us to look for more markets to trade with. Thus creating a bigger value system in the world instead of the current mono value system. Where the US services and protects the Communist Chinese production, instead of competiting with it. This then would allow the world to feed more people. As the more competitive countries get the more surplus each one will see. As they will all strive to create market places for their business to sell too. Therefore, allowing for a bigger spread of wealth and more philanthropy, world fights against poverty and a myriad of other things that come out of competition; instead of service and protection.
So we can see that the 3 mine permits as a small family owned mine spread. Would do such great things as take down the US's current carbon foot print; destroy the deficit as we get a surplus of fresh jobs, production and foreign treasury; create bigger and healthier market places in the world; along with my favorite give the world's current biggest protector and funder of terrorism and genocide a good competitive go at it, instead of constantly servicing, protecting and going literally dead and debt into their market place.
Rider I
Antagonist: Communist China's funding of terrorism and genocide, along with a monopoly on resources.
Protagonist: US's under dog protecting from the CCP's funded terrorist and genocidal dictators.
Plot: The US's need to balance its deficits and create good happy well being in its country via a creation of a strong economic foundation.
No comments:
Post a Comment